Systematic reviews performed within the UU and UMC Utrecht

This dataset contains an overview of 117 systematic reviews published by corresponding authors affiliated to Utrecht University (UU) or UMC Utrecht in 2020. Within the dataset you can find additional information on:

 

  • Number of screened titles
  • Number of included titles after title-abstract screening
  • Number of included titles after full text screening
  • Number of included titles in published systematic review
  • Availability of a reproducible search query as mentioned in the paper
  • Availability of a dataset of screened papers as mentioned in the paper.

 

Jan de Boer, Laura Hofstee, Sybren Hindriks, & Rens van de Schoot. (2021). Systematic Reviews at Utrecht University and UMC Utrecht 2020 (1.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4725568

Systematic reviews at UU and UMC
Figure depicting the number of records that were screened and the percentage of relevant records across systematic reviews performed at the UU and UMC Utrecht.
Data publication
GitHub
Categories: Data, Documentation, Scientific Papers

Check out similar projects

Optimizing ASReview simulations

Optimizing ASReview simulations with multiprocessing solutions for ‘light-data’ and ‘heavy-data’ users via a Kubernetes cluster.

The FORAS project

The FORAS project will replicate and extend an original review integrating advanced machine-learning techniques via the OpenAlex database.

The Mega Meta project: Substance use, anxiety and depression

The MegaMeta project is a large scale project to review factors that contribute to substance use, anxiety and depressive disorders. Read more information on the search and screening protocol, hyperparameter tuning and post-processing used in this post.

Using ASReview on your tablet

AI-aided literature screening in medical guideline development

In a time of exponential growth of new evidence supporting clinical decision making, combined with a labor-intensive process of selecting this evidence, there is a need for methods to speed up current processes in order to keep medical guidelines up-to-date.

ASReview paper explosion

Paper introducing the ASReview project

We show that by using active learning, ASReview can lead to far more efficient reviewing than manual reviewing, while exhibiting adequate quality. Furthermore, the presented software is fully transparent and open source.

Systematic review data about depression

Explore the systematic review dataset that was used for the publication “Psychological theories of depressive relapse and recurrence” from Brouwer et al., 2019. From pre-processing to the final dataset, a look into the complete systematic review process behind this publication.