Free and open source software for systematic reviewing.
ASReview uses state-of-the-art active learning techniques to solve one of the most interesting challenges in screening large amounts of text: there’s not enough time to read everything! Learn more about the free and open source software for systematic reviewing: ASReview LAB.
ASReview has grown into a vivid community of researchers, users, and developers from around the world. Join the community today by taking part in discussions, submitting ideas for new features, or by joining the development-fund and support ASReview to continue its open-source mission.
The software is installed on your device locally. This ensures that nobody else has access to your data, except when you share it with others. Nice, isn’t it?
Download now!
With the smart project setup features, you can start a new project in minutes.
Ready, set, start screening!
Go!
Downloads
Organizations
Github stars
How to screen (tens of) thousands of papers by hand for inclusion in your systematic review, meta-analysis, medical guideline, or overview? As truly relevant records are very sparse (often <5%), this is an extremely time-intensive and error-prone task. The research focuses on:
Curious to how this works? See the Nature Machine Intelligence paper or the introduction video.
The Research Team continuously explores and investigates new ways for improvement through simulation studies, use-cases, and more. The team doesn’t do this all alone, but often together with other organizations, research groups, and developers. The findings are published in peer-reviewed journals like Nature Machine Intelligence. By publishing data, scripts and underlying code, all work becomes fully transparent too.
In a time of exponential growth of new evidence supporting clinical decision making, combined with a labor-intensive process of selecting this evidence, there is a need for methods to speed up current processes in order to keep medical guidelines up-to-date.
We show that by using active learning, ASReview can lead to far more efficient reviewing than manual reviewing, while exhibiting adequate quality. Furthermore, the presented software is fully transparent and open source.
After manually screening 5050 studies, Smid et al included only 27 studies for their review. In the current study, both the Bayesian and logistic regression models found more than 80% of relevant publications after screening only 10% of all publications.
To determine the defaults we performed a simulation study and Naive Bayes + TF-IDF model performed the best.
The CORD-19 database is available in ASReview and can be used to search for relevant Corona-related publication using active learning.
Combining human intelligence and machine learning into Researcher-in-the-loop machine learning. An effective technique for training models.
Donations and sponsorships help innovation and development new features. Donations are accepted from both individuals and organizations. Start sponsoring today!
ODISSEI and ASReview collaboration: start of ASReview Academy Through our partnership with ODISSEI, we’re very excited…
ASReview LAB Class 101 Welcome to ASReview LAB class 101, an introduction to the most important…
If you are screening in ASReview, you may want to find more information on the title…
How A.I. may make sense of 50,000 coronavirus research papers BY JONATHAN VANIAN April 28, 2020…
The ASReview tool offers effective, reliable and transparent title-abstract screening. It combines machine (deep) learning…
Hey there! My name is Joukje Willemsen and I’m the creator of ELAS (the icon of…
The call ‘Corona: fast-track data’ is developed by the NWO to provide funding for projects that…
The ASReview team wins the KNVI- Victorine van Schaickfonds Initiative Award!!! We are very happy with this…
