Free and open source software for systematic reviewing.
ASReview uses state-of-the-art active learning techniques to solve one of the most interesting challenges in screening large amounts of text: there’s not enough time to read everything! Learn more about the free and open source software for systematic reviewing: ASReview LAB.
ASReview has grown into a vivid community of researchers, users, and developers from around the world. Join the community today by taking part in discussions, submitting ideas for new features, or by joining the development-fund and support ASReview to continue its open-source mission.
The software is installed on your device locally. This ensures that nobody else has access to your data, except when you share it with others. Nice, isn’t it?
Download now!
With the smart project setup features, you can start a new project in minutes.
Ready, set, start screening!
Go!
Downloads
Organizations
Github stars
How to screen (tens of) thousands of papers by hand for inclusion in your systematic review, meta-analysis, medical guideline, or overview? As truly relevant records are very sparse (often <5%), this is an extremely time-intensive and error-prone task. The research focuses on:
Curious to how this works? See the Nature Machine Intelligence paper or the introduction video.
The Research Team continuously explores and investigates new ways for improvement through simulation studies, use-cases, and more. The team doesn’t do this all alone, but often together with other organizations, research groups, and developers. The findings are published in peer-reviewed journals like Nature Machine Intelligence. By publishing data, scripts and underlying code, all work becomes fully transparent too.
ASReview conducted a simulation study on risk analysis documents to evaluate the time-benefit for the Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association.
The MegaMeta project is a large scale project to review factors that contribute to substance use, anxiety and depressive disorders. Read more information on the search and screening protocol, hyperparameter tuning and post-processing used in this post.
This systematic review focused on synthesizing information on studies that evaluated the performance of Active Learning compared to human reading.
The ASReview research team conducted a systematic review on the implementation of AI-aided Systematic Reviews within Clinical Guideline Development.
In a time of exponential growth of new evidence supporting clinical decision making, combined with a labor-intensive process of selecting this evidence, there is a need for methods to speed up current processes in order to keep medical guidelines up-to-date.
This dataset contains an overview of 117 systematic reviews published by corresponding authors affiliated to Utrecht University (UU) or UMC Utrecht in 2020.
We show that by using active learning, ASReview can lead to far more efficient reviewing than manual reviewing, while exhibiting adequate quality. Furthermore, the presented software is fully transparent and open source.
Explore the systematic review dataset that was used for the publication “Psychological theories of depressive relapse and recurrence” from Brouwer et al., 2019. From pre-processing to the final dataset, a look into the complete systematic review process behind this publication.
Recreate the simulation study on the systematic review of Smid et al.. From pre-processing to the final dataset, dive into the complete process behind this publication.
After manually screening 5050 studies, Smid et al included only 27 studies for their review. In the current study, both the Bayesian and logistic regression models found more than 80% of relevant publications after screening only 10% of all publications.
To determine the defaults we performed a simulation study and Naive Bayes + TF-IDF model performed the best.
Donations and sponsorships help innovation and development new features. Donations are accepted from both individuals and organizations. Start sponsoring today!
Full Circle Connecting RIS import to export functionalities Download ASReview LAB 0.19Update to ASReview LAB 0.19…
Meet Front-End Developer and ASReview Maintainer Yongchao Ma As a user of ASReview, you are probably…
This event has passed The winners of the hackathon were: Data pre-processing: Teamwork by: Raymon van…
More models more options, available now! Version 0.18 slowly opens ways to the soon to be…
Simulation Mode Class 101 Have you ever done a systematic review manually, but wondered how much…
ODISSEI and ASReview collaboration: start of ASReview Academy Through our partnership with ODISSEI, we’re very excited…
ASReview LAB Class 101 Welcome to ASReview LAB class 101, an introduction to the most important…
Tools that work well with ASReview: Google Scholar Button If you are screening in ASReview, you…
Interview in Fortune In a time where a lot of research needs to be done as…
The importance of abstracts ASReview LAB offers effective, reliable and transparent title-abstract screening. It combines machine…
The story behind ELAS Hey there! My name is Joukje Willemsen and I’m the creator of…
ASReview receives NWO grant The call ‘Corona: fast-track data’ is developed by the NWO to provide…
